Oct 1, 2005 12:00 PM

SHOULD solar energy shining down on crops be considered an energy expenditure when figuring the net energy gain of producing ethanol from corn? Most reasonable people would say no. But others with close ties to the oil industry think differently. Take, for example, anti-biotechnology researcher David Pimentel and Tad Patzek, a former employee of Shell Oil and paid consultant to Shell and Chevron.

Patzek and Pimentel recently teamed up to produce a study on the net energy balance of ethanol. Gaining considerable national attention, the study alleges ethanol production requires more energy than the resulting ethanol fuel contains. Despite a wealth of research to the contrary, Pimentel has repeatedly made this same assertion in the past.

To set the record straight, the National Corn Growers Association has compiled information that questions Pimentel's and Patzek's credibility as well as the oil industry's influence on these studies. Meanwhile, numerous government and university studies demonstrate ethanol's positive energy balance.

To read the NCGA report, visit ncga.com/ethanol/debunking/index.htm.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media, Inc.

VIDEOS

PRODUCTS

TECHNOLOGY

Farm Industry News TV Watch video produced by the editors to show the latest equipment from the NFMS and UV Rodeo.

Product Tests See the results of the latest farm product tests conducted by Team FIN farmers and magazine editors.

Green Agriculture Recent articles on Biofuels, Water Quality, Credits, and what "green" practices will impact your business.